Regulations

Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP introduces key changes to Vietnam’s e-commerce regulatory framework. It covers enforcement and administration areas including law enforcement coordination, tax administration, market surveillance, and consumer protection requirements related to online commerce.

The FAQ states that customers have 14 calendar days from receipt of the order to return a product, referencing article 104 of Spain’s consumer protection law (TRLGDCU). It appears to be a merchant’s summary for Spain rather than a Taiwan-specific regulation.

The page describes a “refund policy” that is governed by United Arab Emirates law and states that nothing in the policy limits the customer’s statutory rights under the UAE Consumer Protection Law. In other words, it’s a seller policy that explicitly references UAE consumer-protection rules governing refunds and consumer rights.

The Malaysian government is studying a framework to provide vehicle owners a statutory “right to repair,” referencing regulation under the Consumer Protection Act 1999 and aiming to balance manufacturer and consumer rights. While the article is about vehicles, the framework could influence broader consumer repair/parts-access rules.

The document is a testimony related to legislative proposals aimed at strengthening consumer protection, improving transparency, and reducing fraud. It warns that some consumer-protection legislation could inadvertently weaken protections instead of improving them.

The document appears to be the text of a bill introduced in the Canadian Senate (S. ____), associated with the sponsor Moreno. The snippet indicates references to an “Act” that is named (e.g., a “Canada Fire Act”), but the provided excerpt does not clearly show any content related to device warranties, insurance, subscriptions, or consumer protection for electronics.

The page describes customer service policies related to online/distance selling, including a right to cancel an order within 14 calendar days of receiving goods under applicable distance-selling legislation. It’s focused on retail purchases (order cancellation) rather than warranties or service coverage terms.

Malaysia’s “Right to Repair” movement is gaining momentum, with a proposed “Lemon Law” in Budget 2026 that would amend the Consumer Protection Act 1999. The aim is to give consumers stronger remedies when they buy defective goods—potentially including devices that don’t meet quality or performance expectations.

The page is about the seller’s return and refund policy. It states that nothing in the policy is meant to exclude any rights the consumer has under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 or other consumer protection laws that cannot be excluded.

The article reports that a proposed “lemon law” in Thailand is moving closer to enactment, aiming to address gaps in Thailand’s consumer protection framework. A lemon law typically provides remedies when goods repeatedly fail to meet quality/performance standards, potentially including rights related to repair, replacement, or refunds.

The article summarizes Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) takeaways, including that legislation is expected in the final quarter of 2026. It also notes ongoing CCPC engagement with stakeholders in 2025 related to public procurement and related activities, suggesting regulatory work that could lead to future consumer-related rules.

The article provides an overview of Australian laws that are relevant to adopting AI, covering privacy, consumer protection, anti-discrimination, and intellectual property. It describes the legal landscape rather than a specific rule targeting device warranties or protection plans.

The article claims that South Korea’s Act on Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions requires all new iPhones to include a mandatory 1-year manufacturer warranty covering hardware defects.

Thailand is introducing a long-awaited consumer “lemon law” intended to protect buyers of defective products. Announced as coming into effect around June 16, 2026, it would provide remedies when goods repeatedly fail to meet quality or performance expectations, potentially including replacement or refunds after specified attempts at repair.

The article says Malaysia’s consumer affairs authority (KPDN) is evaluating whether it needs specific legislation under the Consumer Protection Act 1999, including possible new regulations that would support a “right to repair” approach—allowing servicing outside official service centres. While the context is cars, the underlying idea is consumer protections around repairs rather than being limited to authorised networks.

The article describes a court decision related to a dispute over discontinuation of device features. While the court dismissed some consumer protection claims for technical reasons (pleading deficiencies), it allowed the parties to amend their claims rather than shutting the theories down entirely.

The article is a practical 2025 guide on buying a phone in Saudi Arabia. It claims—at a high level—that Saudi consumer law gives consumers full rights, including replacement for defective units, referencing the Saudi Consumer Protection Law and general defective-product remedies.

A new draft “Lemon Law” in Thailand has been proposed by the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) to better protect buyers who purchase defective goods. The proposal aims to set clearer, more practical rules for remedies when products fail to meet standards (e.g., defects and customer recourse).

This appears to be a UK-focused overview of key product regulations related to consumer safety and product liability, including market surveillance, corrective action planning, and the role of designated standards. It discusses how product liability works under the UK Consumer Protection framework for defective products.

The article says Siam Legal International is reporting that Thailand’s “Lemon Law” bill is moving closer to enactment. The reported bill is intended to address a gap in Thailand’s consumer protection framework by providing remedies when goods are defective and fail to meet expectations.